Wi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN) Message Board

We're offering Lifetime and discounted 3-year Subscriptions this month only. Details here

From: P2V	11/3/2009 9:11:36 PM
	Read Replies (1) of 14781

<A HREF='http://usas1.advfn.com/oasis/oasisc.php?s=45&w=336&h=280&t=_blank' TARGET='_blank'><IMG SRC='http://usas1.advfn.com/oasis/oasisi.php?s=45&w=336&h=280&t=_blank' WIDTH=336 HEIGHT=280 BORDER=0></A>Wi-LAN is encouraged by this order requiring Intel to respond October 30, 2009 Circuit Judge Rader of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issues order requiring Intel Corporation to respond by November 13, 2009 to Wi-LAN’s petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to vacate its June 4, 2009 order denying Wi-LAN’s motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Management Comment Wi-LAN is encouraged by this order requiring Intel to respond to Wi-LAN’s mandamus petition, since the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit often rejects such petitions without requiring any response from the opposing party. Click here to view Wi-LAN's mandamus petition. http://www.wi-lan.com/Theme/WiLan/files/documents_litigation/intel-vs-wilan/No%20%202009-____%20petition%20E-File.pdf http://www.wi-lan.com/company/Investors/Litigation-Updates/Intel-v-Wi-LAN-Northern-District-of-California/default.aspx
<A HREF='http://usas1.advfn.com/oasis/oasisc.php?s=56&w=750&h=50&t=_blank' TARGET='_blank'><IMG SRC='http://usas1.advfn.com/oasis/oasisi.php?s=56&w=750&h=50&t=_blank' WIDTH=750 HEIGHT=50 BORDER=0></A>